Acushnet Holdings Corp. GOLF (last ticker on record)
CIK 1672013Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Jun 2025 · Named in a filing · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Oct 2016 · Text search only · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Shin & KimFirst linked Oct 2016 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Bryan CaveFirst linked Sep 2016 · Text search only · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Aug 2016 · Text search only · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Chadbourne & ParkeFirst linked Jun 2016 · Text search only · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ropes & Gray | Jun 2025 | Named in a filing | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jun 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Oct 2016 | Text search only | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Shin & Kim | Oct 2016 | Text search only | 22 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.16 |
| Bryan Cave | Sep 2016 | Text search only | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| Maples and Calder | Aug 2016 | Text search only | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Chadbourne & Parke | Jun 2016 | Text search only | 110 | 1.64 | 0.62 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Thomas FraserRopes & GrayFirst linked Jun 2025 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Kirk A. DavenportLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2016 · Text search only · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Nathan AjiashviliLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2016 · Text search only · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas FraserRopes & Gray | Jun 2025 | Named in a filing | 17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Kirk A. DavenportLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2016 | Text search only | 52 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Nathan AjiashviliLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2016 | Text search only | 76 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 1.17 |