Adient plc ADNT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1670541Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Apr 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Nov 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Apr 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- A&L GoodbodyFirst linked Jul 2016 · Text search only · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jul 2016 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Linklaters LLPFirst linked Jul 2016 · Text search only · 156 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foley & Lardner | Nov 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Apr 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| A&L Goodbody | Jul 2016 | Text search only | 85 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Jul 2016 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Linklaters LLP | Jul 2016 | Text search only | 156 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jessica S. LochmannFoley & LardnerFirst linked Nov 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Andrew E. ZuckermanReid and RiegeFirst linked Oct 2016 · Named in a filing · 72 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- ANDREW R. BROWNSTEINWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jun 2016 · Text search only · 117 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
- David K. LamWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Apr 2016 · Text search only · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jessica S. LochmannFoley & Lardner | Nov 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 1.84 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Andrew E. ZuckermanReid and Riege | Oct 2016 | Named in a filing | 72 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.72 |
| ANDREW R. BROWNSTEINWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jun 2016 | Text search only | 117 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
| David K. LamWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Apr 2016 | Text search only | 110 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 0.52 |