U.S. WELL SERVICES HOLDINGS, LLC USWS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1670349Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began May 2021
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Nov 2018 to May 2022
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brown RudnickFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in a filing · 137 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Porter & HedgesFirst linked Jun 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 108 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Mar 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Bracewell LLPFirst linked Aug 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 247 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Aug 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Apr 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLPFirst linked Apr 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 127 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brown Rudnick | Nov 2022 | Named in a filing | 137 | 0.84 | 0.90 | 0.97 |
| Porter & Hedges | Jun 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 108 | 1.13 | 0.36 | 1.44 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Mar 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Bracewell LLP | Aug 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 247 | 0.93 | 0.31 | 1.03 |
| Winston & Strawn | Aug 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Apr 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP | Apr 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 127 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- James E. BedarBrown RudnickFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- Samuel P. WilliamsBrown RudnickFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Adam K. NalleyPorter & HedgesFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Hillary H. HolmesGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Mar 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Elliott M. SmithWhite & CaseFirst linked Dec 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.51× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Charles StillBracewell LLPFirst linked Sep 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.71×
- Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Apr 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 338 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Stuart NeuhauserEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Apr 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 416 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James E. BedarBrown Rudnick | Nov 2022 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.52 |
| Samuel P. WilliamsBrown Rudnick | Nov 2022 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Adam K. NalleyPorter & Hedges | Aug 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Hillary H. HolmesGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Mar 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 44 | 1.21 | 0.00 | 1.48 |
| Elliott M. SmithWhite & Case | Dec 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 107 | 1.26 | 0.51 | 1.11 |
| Charles StillBracewell LLP | Sep 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 0.31 | 0.00 | 1.71 |
| Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Apr 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 338 | 0.95 | 0.66 | 0.95 |
| Stuart NeuhauserEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Apr 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 416 | 0.78 | 0.42 | 1.04 |