Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. ULCC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1670076Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Mar 2026
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Mar 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked May 2022 · Text search only · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2022 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Vedder PriceFirst linked Mar 2021 · Text search only · 144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Feb 2021 · Text search only · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Sherman & Howard L.L.C.First linked Jan 2021 · Text search only · 105 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Hogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Jun 2017 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Snell & WilmerFirst linked Jun 2017 · Text search only · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.19× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Clifford Chance US LLPFirst linked May 2017 · Text search only · 260 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Faegre Baker DanielsFirst linked Mar 2017 · Text search only · 145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Mar 2017 · Text search only · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Mar 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 1.04 |
| Davis Polk | Mar 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | May 2022 | Text search only | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Shearman & Sterling | May 2022 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Vedder Price | Mar 2021 | Text search only | 144 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.94 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Feb 2021 | Text search only | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Sherman & Howard L.L.C. | Jan 2021 | Text search only | 105 | 1.02 | 0.99 | 1.48 |
| Hogan Lovells US LLP | Jun 2017 | Text search only | 487 | 0.96 | 0.26 | 0.85 |
| Snell & Wilmer | Jun 2017 | Text search only | 244 | 1.34 | 1.19 | 1.38 |
| Clifford Chance US LLP | May 2017 | Text search only | 260 | 0.92 | 0.41 | 0.85 |
| Faegre Baker Daniels | Mar 2017 | Text search only | 145 | 1.06 | 0.34 | 1.16 |
| Foley & Lardner | Mar 2017 | Text search only | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brian D. MillerLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2026 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.06×
- Eric T. JuergensDebevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.95×
- Mark BekheitLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.96×
- Alan F. DenenbergDavis PolkFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 114 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Miles P. JenningsLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.01×
- Anthony J. RichmondLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 2.51×
- Brian D. PaulsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Douglas R. WrightFaegre & BensonFirst linked Mar 2017 · Text search only · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 1.55× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Tony RichmondLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2017 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian D. MillerLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2026 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 1.30 | 0.00 | 2.06 |
| Eric T. JuergensDebevoise & Plimpton | Mar 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 1.95 |
| Mark BekheitLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 2.04 | 0.00 | 1.96 |
| Alan F. DenenbergDavis Polk | Mar 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 114 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 1.46 |
| Miles P. JenningsLatham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.40 | 0.00 | 2.01 |
| Anthony J. RichmondLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 0.99 | 0.77 | 2.51 |
| Brian D. PaulsonLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 0.35 | 0.00 | 1.26 |
| Douglas R. WrightFaegre & Benson | Mar 2017 | Text search only | 23 | 0.75 | 1.55 | 1.30 |
| Tony RichmondLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2017 | Text search only | 7 | 1.65 | 0.00 | 0.00 |