Lonestar Resources US Inc. LONE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1661920Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Oct 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Jul 2016 to Sep 2020
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Sep 2021 · Named in a filing · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Sep 2021 · Named in a filing · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Baker & HostetlerFirst linked Oct 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 231 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Oct 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Dec 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Jackson Walker L.L.P.First linked Feb 2016 · Text search only · 158 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Thompson & KnightFirst linked Dec 2015 · Text search only · 198 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Winstead PCFirst linked Dec 2015 · Text search only · 121 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP | Sep 2021 | Named in a filing | 161 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Sep 2021 | Named in a filing | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| Baker & Hostetler | Oct 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 231 | 1.11 | 1.12 | 1.35 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Oct 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Dec 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Jackson Walker L.L.P. | Feb 2016 | Text search only | 158 | 1.10 | 0.81 | 1.39 |
| Thompson & Knight | Dec 2015 | Text search only | 198 | 1.03 | 0.40 | 1.38 |
| Winstead PC | Dec 2015 | Text search only | 121 | 1.19 | 0.85 | 1.27 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kevin M. RichardsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- David MillerLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- David J. MillerLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Oct 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.04×
- J. Michael ChambersLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Oct 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Mark L. JonesBaker & HostetlerFirst linked Oct 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.74×
- Andrew ReillyBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 3.05× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- William D. Davis IIBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kevin M. RichardsonLatham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 0.62 |
| David MillerLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 1.49 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| David J. MillerLatham & Watkins LLP | Oct 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 1.04 | 0.00 | 2.04 |
| J. Michael ChambersLatham & Watkins LLP | Oct 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.57 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Mark L. JonesBaker & Hostetler | Oct 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.74 |
| Andrew ReillyBaker & McKenzie | Feb 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.00 | 3.05 | 0.92 |
| William D. Davis IIBaker & McKenzie | Feb 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 1.50 |