Highlands REIT, Inc. HHDS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1661458Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Sep 2026 · Named in a filing · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Alston & BirdFirst linked Oct 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Duval & StachenfeldFirst linked Sep 2016 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 4.63× · 95% wipeout 2.45×
- Venable LLPFirst linked Apr 2016 · Named in a filing · 506 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPFirst linked Mar 2016 · Text search only · 268 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Dec 2015 · Text search only · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayer Brown | Sep 2026 | Named in a filing | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| Alston & Bird | Oct 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.79 |
| Duval & Stachenfeld | Sep 2016 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.00 | 4.63 | 2.45 |
| Venable LLP | Apr 2016 | Named in a filing | 506 | 0.79 | 0.38 | 0.73 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Mar 2016 | Text search only | 268 | 0.76 | 0.58 | 1.22 |
| Hunton & Williams | Dec 2015 | Text search only | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David S. FreedVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Sep 2026 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Cathy A. BirkelandLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.23×
- Dennis O. GarrisAlston & BirdFirst linked Nov 2023 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert H. BaumProskauer RoseFirst linked Mar 2016 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David S. FreedVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Sep 2026 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Cathy A. BirkelandLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.23 |
| Dennis O. GarrisAlston & Bird | Nov 2023 | Text search only | 16 | 1.23 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert H. BaumProskauer Rose | Mar 2016 | Text search only | 9 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 0.00 |