Permian Resources Corp PR (last ticker on record)

CIK 1658566Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

95% wipeout
Delisting notice (not a red flag)
Restructuring

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 2; Newest began Aug 2025
Largest fall in its shares: 98%; Oct 2018 to Mar 2020
Law firms: 8; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 18; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

Aug 28, 2025Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Sep 8, 2022Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Aug 13, 2020Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 23, 2020Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Mar 9, 2020Shares down 95% from their high
May 13, 2019Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Kirkland & Ellis	Jun 2022	Named in SEC correspondence	1,686	0.98	0.17	0.87
Latham & Watkins LLP	Jul 2016	Named in SEC correspondence	2,667	0.98	0.31	1.10
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP	Nov 2015	Named in SEC correspondence	127	1.28	0.00	0.91
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.	Nov 2015	Named in SEC correspondence	783	1.09	0.11	1.03
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP	Nov 2015	Named in SEC correspondence	1,051	1.31	0.27	0.91
Norton Rose	Sep 2023	Text search only	304	1.11	0.52	1.24
Kelly Hart & Hallman	Jan 2017	Text search only	30	0.57	0.00	0.74
Bracewell LLP	Jan 2016	Text search only	247	0.93	0.31	1.03

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Alexandra M. LewisVinson & Elkins L.L.P.	Jan 2026	Named in a filing	9	0.00	0.00	0.00
Jackson A. O'MaleyVinson & Elkins L.L.P.	Nov 2024	Named in SEC correspondence	13	0.00	0.00	0.00
Jackson A. O MaleyVinson & Elkins L.L.P.	May 2024	Named in a filing	15	0.00	0.00	0.00
Thomas G. ZentnerVinson & Elkins L.L.P.	Sep 2023	Named in SEC correspondence	21	0.00	0.00	1.01
Michael W. RigdonKirkland & Ellis	Sep 2023	Named in SEC correspondence	25	0.00	0.00	0.82
Ryan J. MaiersonLatham & Watkins LLP	Jun 2022	Named in SEC correspondence	135	1.27	0.00	1.28
Sean T. WheelerLatham & Watkins LLP	Jun 2022	Named in SEC correspondence	59	0.97	0.00	1.31
John M. GreerLatham & Watkins LLP	May 2020	Named in SEC correspondence	28	0.00	0.00	1.53
Bill FinneganLatham & Watkins LLP	Mar 2017	Named in SEC correspondence	5	0.85	0.00	1.08
Debbie P. YeeLatham & Watkins LLP	Jul 2016	Named in SEC correspondence	60	0.85	0.00	1.33
Douglas E. McWilliamsVinson & Elkins L.L.P.	Jul 2016	Named in SEC correspondence	62	0.75	0.00	1.10
Raymond O. GietzWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP	Jul 2016	Named in SEC correspondence	28	1.36	1.25	0.58
William N. Finnegan IVLatham & Watkins LLP	Jul 2016	Named in SEC correspondence	39	0.57	0.00	1.11
Paul D. TroppRopes & Gray	Jan 2016	Named in SEC correspondence	108	0.85	0.00	0.94
Jennifer A. BenschWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP	Nov 2015	Named in SEC correspondence	37	0.63	0.00	0.59
Brett E. BradenLatham & Watkins LLP	Jul 2016	Text search only	11	1.00	0.00	0.78
Matthew StrockVinson & Elkins L.L.P.	Jul 2016	Text search only	15	0.95	0.00	2.29
W. Matthew StrockVinson & Elkins L.L.P.	Jul 2016	Text search only	20	1.23	0.00	2.02