Gritstone bio, Inc. GRTS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1656634Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Oct 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Dec 2018 to Oct 2024
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Fenwick & West LLPFirst linked Sep 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 443 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked May 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2019 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Jul 2018 · Text search only · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fenwick & West LLP | Sep 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 443 | 0.95 | 0.21 | 1.23 |
| Cooley LLP | May 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | May 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Goodwin Procter | Apr 2019 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Jul 2018 | Text search only | 500 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Chelsea AndersonFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Dec 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
- Effie ToshavFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Dec 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Robert A. FreedmanFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Dec 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Ryan MittenessFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Dec 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Mark V. RoederLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in a filing · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Alexander T. WhiteLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.46×
- Alan C. MendelsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Brian J. CuneoLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 71 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.54× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.81×
- David PeinsippCooley LLPFirst linked May 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 86 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
- Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLPFirst linked Oct 2019 · Text search only · 184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chelsea AndersonFenwick & West LLP | Dec 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 1.46 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
| Effie ToshavFenwick & West LLP | Dec 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.79 |
| Robert A. FreedmanFenwick & West LLP | Dec 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 69 | 0.86 | 0.53 | 0.96 |
| Ryan MittenessFenwick & West LLP | Dec 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 0.91 |
| Mark V. RoederLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2023 | Named in a filing | 50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.32 |
| Alexander T. WhiteLatham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.46 |
| Alan C. MendelsonLatham & Watkins LLP | May 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 95 | 0.60 | 0.19 | 1.35 |
| Brian J. CuneoLatham & Watkins LLP | May 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 71 | 0.54 | 0.00 | 1.81 |
| David PeinsippCooley LLP | May 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 86 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 1.55 |
| Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLP | Oct 2019 | Text search only | 184 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 1.03 |