Ingevity Corp NGVT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1653477Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker & HostetlerFirst linked May 2023 · Named in a filing · 231 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- McGuireWoods LLPFirst linked May 2016 · Named in a filing · 358 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Dec 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Bose McKinney & EvansFirst linked Mar 2016 · Text search only · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Dec 2015 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker & Hostetler | May 2023 | Named in a filing | 231 | 1.11 | 1.12 | 1.35 |
| McGuireWoods LLP | May 2016 | Named in a filing | 358 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 1.11 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Dec 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Bose McKinney & Evans | Mar 2016 | Text search only | 26 | 0.35 | 0.00 | 1.05 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Dec 2015 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Chelsea N. DarnellPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Apr 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Gregory E. OstlingWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Dec 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chelsea N. DarnellPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Apr 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 3.53 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Gregory E. OstlingWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Dec 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 44 | 1.11 | 0.00 | 0.52 |