ICHOR HOLDINGS, LTD. ICHR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1652535Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sheppard MullinFirst linked May 2026 · Named in a filing · 392 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Sep 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Sep 2015 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Shartsis Friese LLPFirst linked Sep 2015 · Text search only · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.62×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2015 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sheppard Mullin | May 2026 | Named in a filing | 392 | 1.12 | 0.81 | 1.22 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Sep 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Maples and Calder | Sep 2015 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Shartsis Friese LLP | Sep 2015 | Text search only | 52 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 1.62 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Sep 2015 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alexander M. SchwartzSheppard MullinFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Bradley ReedKirkland & EllisFirst linked Dec 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Robert M. HaywardKirkland & EllisFirst linked Sep 2015 · Text search only · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Tad J. FreeseLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2015 · Text search only · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.80× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander M. SchwartzSheppard Mullin | Aug 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Bradley ReedKirkland & Ellis | Dec 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 1.08 |
| Robert M. HaywardKirkland & Ellis | Sep 2015 | Text search only | 38 | 1.78 | 0.00 | 1.19 |
| Tad J. FreeseLatham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2015 | Text search only | 58 | 0.63 | 0.80 | 1.41 |