Andina Acquisition Corp. II ANDA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1652101Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Blank RomeFirst linked Sep 2015 · Named in a filing · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Graubard MillerFirst linked Sep 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 418 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Sep 2015 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Forbes HareFirst linked Nov 2015 · Text search only · 57 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 1.64× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blank Rome | Sep 2015 | Named in a filing | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| Graubard Miller | Sep 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 418 | 0.92 | 0.75 | 1.16 |
| Maples and Calder | Sep 2015 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Forbes Hare | Nov 2015 | Text search only | 57 | 1.00 | 1.64 | 0.82 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brad L. ShiffmanBlank RomeFirst linked Sep 2015 · Named in a filing · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- David Alan MillerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Sep 2015 · Named in a filing · 231 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Jeffrey M. GallantGraubard MillerFirst linked Sep 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 195 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.64× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Robert J. MittmanBlank RomeFirst linked Sep 2015 · Named in a filing · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 2.58×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brad L. ShiffmanBlank Rome | Sep 2015 | Named in a filing | 47 | 1.33 | 0.74 | 1.61 |
| David Alan MillerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Sep 2015 | Named in a filing | 231 | 1.06 | 0.74 | 1.33 |
| Jeffrey M. GallantGraubard Miller | Sep 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 195 | 0.96 | 0.64 | 1.20 |
| Robert J. MittmanBlank Rome | Sep 2015 | Named in a filing | 47 | 1.72 | 0.43 | 2.58 |