AC Immune SA ACIU (last ticker on record)
CIK 1651625Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Aug 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Jones DayFirst linked Nov 2015 · Text search only · 685 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Aug 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
| Goodwin Procter | Aug 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.16 |
| Jones Day | Nov 2015 | Text search only | 685 | 1.25 | 0.55 | 1.11 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Derek J. DostalDavis PolkFirst linked Jul 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 114 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Arthur R. McGivernGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Deanna L. KirkpatrickDavis PolkFirst linked Aug 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 113 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Mitchell S. BloomGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 109 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Richard D. Truesdell Jr.Davis PolkFirst linked Aug 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Derek J. DostalDavis Polk | Jul 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 114 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 1.21 |
| Arthur R. McGivernGoodwin Procter | Aug 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.23 |
| Deanna L. KirkpatrickDavis Polk | Aug 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 113 | 1.73 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| Mitchell S. BloomGoodwin Procter | Aug 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 109 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Richard D. Truesdell Jr.Davis Polk | Aug 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 149 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 1.03 |