loanDepot, Inc.
CIK 1651502Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,688 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Sheppard MullinFirst linked Aug 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 392 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Oct 2015 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Munger Tolles & OlsonFirst linked Oct 2015 · Text search only · 80 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Dentons US LLPFirst linked Oct 2015 · Text search only · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Squire SandersFirst linked Oct 2015 · Text search only · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.94× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Aug 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,688 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| Sheppard Mullin | Aug 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 392 | 1.12 | 0.81 | 1.26 |
| Ballard Spahr | Oct 2015 | Text search only | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.78 |
| Munger Tolles & Olson | Oct 2015 | Text search only | 80 | 1.57 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
| Dentons US LLP | Oct 2015 | Text search only | 102 | 0.90 | 0.40 | 1.47 |
| Squire Sanders | Oct 2015 | Text search only | 208 | 0.90 | 0.94 | 1.03 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joshua N. KorffKirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Michael KimKirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 48 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- Kevin S. MasudaMunger Tolles & OlsonFirst linked Oct 2015 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joshua N. KorffKirkland & Ellis | Aug 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 107 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.35 |
| Michael KimKirkland & Ellis | Aug 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 48 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 1.73 |
| Kevin S. MasudaMunger Tolles & Olson | Oct 2015 | Text search only | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.66 |