Laird Superfood, Inc. LSF (last ticker on record)
CIK 1650696Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Oct 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Dec 2020 to May 2023
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Holland & HartFirst linked Aug 2026 · Named in a filing · 240 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.92× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Jun 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked May 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Hogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked May 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2020 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holland & Hart | Aug 2026 | Named in a filing | 240 | 0.82 | 0.92 | 0.86 |
| Haynes and Boone | Jun 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.84 |
| Goodwin Procter | May 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Hogan Lovells US LLP | May 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 487 | 0.96 | 0.26 | 0.85 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | May 2020 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Matthew L. FryHaynes and BooneFirst linked Jun 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Brandon KinnardHogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Dec 2023 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Thomas S. LevatoGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.32×
- David R. CrandallHogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked May 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 2.39× · 95% wipeout 2.05×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew L. FryHaynes and Boone | Jun 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 0.81 |
| Brandon KinnardHogan Lovells US LLP | Dec 2023 | Named in a filing | 8 | 3.08 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Thomas S. LevatoGoodwin Procter | Aug 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 2.32 |
| David R. CrandallHogan Lovells US LLP | May 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 1.20 | 2.39 | 2.05 |