Atlassian Corp TEAM (last ticker on record)
CIK 1650372Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2026
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Oct 2022 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Aug 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Herbert SmithFirst linked Aug 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Sep 2015 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Oct 2022 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Cooley LLP | Aug 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Goodwin Procter | Aug 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Herbert Smith | Aug 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 90 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 0.65 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Sep 2015 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Anthony J. McCuskerGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 1.08× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- David PeinsippCooley LLPFirst linked Aug 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 86 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
- Richard A. KlineGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthony J. McCuskerGoodwin Procter | Aug 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 1.19 | 1.08 | 0.75 |
| David PeinsippCooley LLP | Aug 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 86 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 1.55 |
| Richard A. KlineGoodwin Procter | Aug 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 56 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 1.20 |