Outlook Therapeutics, Inc. OTLK (last ticker on record)
CIK 1649989Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Dec 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Feb 2019 to Mar 2026
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Nov 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Greenbaum Rowe Smith & DavisFirst linked Dec 2015 · Text search only · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 2.23× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Dec 2015 · Text search only · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooley LLP | Nov 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Goodwin Procter | Nov 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Greenbaum Rowe Smith & Davis | Dec 2015 | Text search only | 26 | 1.42 | 2.23 | 1.08 |
| Haynes and Boone | Dec 2015 | Text search only | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Courtney TygessonCooley LLPFirst linked Aug 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Marianne SarrazinGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 2.86× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Edwin O ConnorGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Nov 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Stuart M. CableGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Nov 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 59 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- John D. HogoboomLowenstein SandlerFirst linked Apr 2019 · Text search only · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 1.07× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Edwin M. O ConnorGoodwin ProcterFirst linked May 2016 · Text search only · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.37× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Seo SalimiGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2016 · Text search only · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- W. RAYMOND FELTONGreenbaum Rowe Smith & DavisFirst linked Dec 2015 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.01× · Went dark 3.04× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Courtney TygessonCooley LLP | Aug 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.20 |
| Marianne SarrazinGoodwin Procter | Apr 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 0.77 | 2.86 | 1.25 |
| Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLP | Nov 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 184 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Edwin O ConnorGoodwin Procter | Nov 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 44 | 0.59 | 0.00 | 1.33 |
| Stuart M. CableGoodwin Procter | Nov 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 59 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| John D. HogoboomLowenstein Sandler | Apr 2019 | Text search only | 49 | 0.59 | 1.07 | 1.17 |
| Edwin M. O ConnorGoodwin Procter | May 2016 | Text search only | 30 | 0.37 | 0.00 | 1.18 |
| Seo SalimiGoodwin Procter | Apr 2016 | Text search only | 56 | 0.28 | 0.00 | 1.21 |
| W. RAYMOND FELTONGreenbaum Rowe Smith & Davis | Dec 2015 | Text search only | 14 | 2.01 | 3.04 | 1.33 |