Aralez Pharmaceuticals Plc
CIK 1648419Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Jul 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Fried FrankFirst linked Aug 2015 · Text search only · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Aug 2015 · Text search only · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Blank RomeFirst linked Aug 2015 · Text search only · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Aug 2015 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- A&L GoodbodyFirst linked Jul 2015 · Text search only · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Fogler RubinoffFirst linked Jul 2015 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- McGovern HurleyFirst linked Jul 2015 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 1.40× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Jul 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Fried Frank | Aug 2015 | Text search only | 540 | 1.33 | 0.24 | 0.94 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Aug 2015 | Text search only | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Blank Rome | Aug 2015 | Text search only | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Aug 2015 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| A&L Goodbody | Jul 2015 | Text search only | 85 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Fogler Rubinoff | Jul 2015 | Text search only | 19 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 1.43 |
| McGovern Hurley | Jul 2015 | Text search only | 18 | 0.67 | 1.40 | 1.25 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew P. GilbertDLA PiperFirst linked Jul 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.50× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- David C. SchwartzDLA PiperFirst linked Jul 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.60×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew P. GilbertDLA Piper | Jul 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 49 | 0.65 | 0.50 | 1.01 |
| David C. SchwartzDLA Piper | Jul 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 1.21 | 0.00 | 0.60 |