Zymergen Inc. ZY (last ticker on record)
CIK 1645842Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Sep 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 97%
- Apr 2021 to May 2022
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in a filing · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLPFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 127 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Gunderson DettmerFirst linked Mar 2021 · Text search only · 333 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jan 2021 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2021 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Jan 2021 · Text search only · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ropes & Gray | Sep 2022 | Named in a filing | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 127 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 0.91 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Gunderson Dettmer | Mar 2021 | Text search only | 333 | 1.17 | 0.66 | 1.32 |
| Davis Polk | Jan 2021 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2021 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Jan 2021 | Text search only | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew S. GillmanWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
- Andrew T. HillWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.56×
- Pamela L. MarcoglieseCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Sarah K. SolumDavis PolkFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.57×
- Brian J. CuneoLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2021 · Text search only · 71 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.54× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.81×
- Haim ZaltzmanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2021 · Text search only · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew S. GillmanWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 2.98 | 0.00 | 1.51 |
| Andrew T. HillWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 2.56 |
| Pamela L. MarcoglieseCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 2.60 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Sarah K. SolumDavis Polk | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 44 | 1.07 | 0.00 | 1.57 |
| Brian J. CuneoLatham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2021 | Text search only | 71 | 0.54 | 0.00 | 1.81 |
| Haim ZaltzmanLatham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2021 | Text search only | 27 | 1.25 | 0.00 | 1.61 |