SoulCycle Inc.
CIK 1644874Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Jun 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Blank RomeFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 1,185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Lowenstein SandlerFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 297 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Schiff HardinFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Steptoe & JohnsonFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 80 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.65× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Hastings | Jun 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.08 |
| Blank Rome | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.37 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.75 |
| DLA Piper | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 1,185 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.17 |
| Lowenstein Sandler | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 297 | 1.12 | 0.70 | 1.43 |
| Schiff Hardin | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 184 | 0.78 | 0.85 | 1.24 |
| Steptoe & Johnson | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 80 | 1.10 | 0.65 | 1.37 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael L. ZupponePaul HastingsFirst linked Jun 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Steven E. SiesserLowenstein SandlerFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael L. ZupponePaul Hastings | Jun 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 0.42 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| Steven E. SiesserLowenstein Sandler | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 25 | 1.08 | 0.62 | 1.50 |