GC Aesthetics plc
CIK 1642195Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Maples and CalderFirst linked May 2015 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked May 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Jul 2015 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Bond DickinsonFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.90×
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maples and Calder | May 2015 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Ropes & Gray | May 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| DLA Piper | Jul 2015 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Bond Dickinson | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.90 |
| Covington & Burling | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.99 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael D. BeauvaisRopes & GrayFirst linked May 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Scott D. ElliottOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked May 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael D. BeauvaisRopes & Gray | May 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
| Scott D. ElliottOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | May 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 1.91 | 0.00 | 0.00 |