LivaNova PLC LIVN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1639691Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jan 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Aug 2021 · Named in a filing · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLPFirst linked Nov 2018 · Named in a filing · 97 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- McGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 358 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Aug 2021 | Named in a filing | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP | Nov 2018 | Named in a filing | 97 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| McGuireWoods LLP | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 358 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 1.11 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Helena K. GrannisCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jun 2022 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.15× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- David LopezCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Aug 2021 · Named in a filing · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
- Abby E. BrownSquire Patton Boggs (US) LLPFirst linked Nov 2018 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Luke J. BergstromLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2015 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helena K. GrannisCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jun 2022 | Named in a filing | 29 | 3.15 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| David LopezCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Aug 2021 | Named in a filing | 55 | 1.99 | 0.00 | 1.56 |
| Abby E. BrownSquire Patton Boggs (US) LLP | Nov 2018 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.43 | 0.00 | 0.97 |
| Luke J. BergstromLatham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2015 | Named in a filing | 18 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 0.00 |