Intec Pharma Ltd. NTEC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1638381Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2019
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Feb 2019 to Aug 2021
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Meitar Law OfficesFirst linked Feb 2020 · Named in a filing · 61 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Aug 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Meitar Liquornik Geva Leshem Tal, Law OfficesFirst linked Apr 2017 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Apr 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Sheppard MullinFirst linked Apr 2021 · Text search only · 392 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Thompson Hine LLPFirst linked Apr 2021 · Text search only · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.64× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Mar 2019 · Text search only · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Horn & Co. Law OfficesFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Pearl CohenFirst linked Apr 2015 · Text search only · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meitar Law Offices | Feb 2020 | Named in a filing | 61 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.69 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Aug 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Meitar Liquornik Geva Leshem Tal, Law Offices | Apr 2017 | Named in a filing | 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.23 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Apr 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Sheppard Mullin | Apr 2021 | Text search only | 392 | 1.12 | 0.81 | 1.22 |
| Thompson Hine LLP | Apr 2021 | Text search only | 208 | 0.95 | 0.64 | 1.09 |
| Cooley LLP | Mar 2019 | Text search only | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Horn & Co. Law Offices | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.51 |
| Ropes & Gray | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Pearl Cohen | Apr 2015 | Text search only | 44 | 1.15 | 0.68 | 1.35 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gary EmmanuelMcDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Aug 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 1.18× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Shachar HadarSullivan & Worcester LLPFirst linked Apr 2017 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Joshua M. SamekGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Apr 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Robert L. GrossmanGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Apr 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- James A. Mercer IIISheppard MullinFirst linked Apr 2021 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.28× · Went dark 2.49× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLPFirst linked Mar 2019 · Text search only · 184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Marc A. RubensteinRopes & GrayFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 48 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gary EmmanuelMcDermott Will & Emery | Aug 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 55 | 0.76 | 1.18 | 1.02 |
| Shachar HadarSullivan & Worcester LLP | Apr 2017 | Named in a filing | 21 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.06 |
| Joshua M. SamekGreenberg Traurig | Apr 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 2.49 | 0.00 | 1.48 |
| Robert L. GrossmanGreenberg Traurig | Apr 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 1.39 |
| James A. Mercer IIISheppard Mullin | Apr 2021 | Text search only | 17 | 2.28 | 2.49 | 1.48 |
| Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLP | Mar 2019 | Text search only | 184 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Marc A. RubensteinRopes & Gray | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 48 | 0.64 | 0.56 | 1.22 |