MetaVia Inc. MTVA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1638287Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Mar 2026
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Apr 2020 to Dec 2024
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in a filing · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Sheppard MullinFirst linked Apr 2020 · Named in a filing · 392 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLPFirst linked Sep 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 159 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Hyman Phelps & McNamaraFirst linked Apr 2016 · Text search only · 105 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Sep 2022 | Named in a filing | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Sheppard Mullin | Apr 2020 | Named in a filing | 392 | 1.12 | 0.81 | 1.22 |
| Cooley LLP | Sep 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP | Sep 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 159 | 0.92 | 0.69 | 0.88 |
| Hyman Phelps & McNamara | Apr 2016 | Text search only | 105 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 1.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joshua W. DammHonigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLPFirst linked Jul 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark — · 95% wipeout 0.68×
- Samuel KatzHonigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLPFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.45×
- Michael F. NertneyEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Jeffrey H. KurasHonigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLPFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.57×
- Robert L. Wernli Jr.Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Apr 2020 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.47× · Went dark 4.61× · 95% wipeout 2.01×
- Emily J. JohnsHonigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLPFirst linked Nov 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- Charles S. KimCooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 118 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Nicole BrookshireCooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- Phillip D. TorrenceHonigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLPFirst linked Sep 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Melanie RuthrauffMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Sep 2019 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2017 · Text search only · 184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joshua W. DammHonigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP | Jul 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | — | 0.68 |
| Samuel KatzHonigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP | Nov 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.45 |
| Michael F. NertneyEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Sep 2022 | Named in a filing | 19 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.04 |
| Jeffrey H. KurasHonigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 0.57 |
| Robert L. Wernli Jr.Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Apr 2020 | Named in a filing | 21 | 2.47 | 4.61 | 2.01 |
| Emily J. JohnsHonigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP | Nov 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.52 |
| Charles S. KimCooley LLP | Sep 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 118 | 0.41 | 0.00 | 1.37 |
| Nicole BrookshireCooley LLP | Sep 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 52 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 1.73 |
| Phillip D. TorrenceHonigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP | Sep 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 1.95 | 0.00 | 0.69 |
| Melanie RuthrauffMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Sep 2019 | Text search only | 9 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLP | Sep 2017 | Text search only | 184 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 1.03 |