Milacron Holdings Corp. MCRN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1637913Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ice MillerFirst linked Oct 2019 · Named in a filing · 112 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Dec 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Apr 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Torys LLPFirst linked Jan 2017 · Text search only · 170 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked May 2015 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Fasken MartineauFirst linked May 2015 · Text search only · 126 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Norton RoseFirst linked May 2015 · Text search only · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2015 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Apr 2015 · Text search only · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ice Miller | Oct 2019 | Named in a filing | 112 | 1.19 | 0.21 | 0.93 |
| Ropes & Gray | Dec 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Apr 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Torys LLP | Jan 2017 | Text search only | 170 | 1.22 | 0.44 | 0.94 |
| Morgan Lewis | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | May 2015 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Fasken Martineau | May 2015 | Text search only | 126 | 1.03 | 0.37 | 0.87 |
| Norton Rose | May 2015 | Text search only | 304 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 1.24 |
| Goodwin Procter | Apr 2015 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Paul Hastings | Apr 2015 | Text search only | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Thomas J. DanielskiRopes & GrayFirst linked Jan 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Craig E. MarcusRopes & GrayFirst linked Dec 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Alexander D. LynchWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Apr 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 115 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.45×
- Heather L. EmmelWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Apr 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- Ian D. SchumanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Marc D. JaffeLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 156 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas J. DanielskiRopes & Gray | Jan 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.93 |
| Craig E. MarcusRopes & Gray | Dec 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 45 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| Alexander D. LynchWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Apr 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 115 | 1.18 | 0.33 | 1.45 |
| Heather L. EmmelWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Apr 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| Ian D. SchumanLatham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 91 | 1.06 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Marc D. JaffeLatham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 156 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 1.12 |