SeaSpine Holdings Corp SPNE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1637761Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in a filing · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Mar 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 2016 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hogan Lovells US LLP | Nov 2022 | Named in a filing | 487 | 0.96 | 0.26 | 0.85 |
| DLA Piper | Mar 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Goodwin Procter | Aug 2016 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Patrick J. O'MalleyDLA PiperFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.34×
- Michael S. KagnoffDLA PiperFirst linked Mar 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.81×
- Kevin C. ReyesLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Edward SonnenscheinLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Patrick J. O MalleyDLA PiperFirst linked Aug 2020 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 4.16×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick J. O'MalleyDLA Piper | Aug 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 2.34 |
| Michael S. KagnoffDLA Piper | Mar 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 1.72 | 0.00 | 1.81 |
| Kevin C. ReyesLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| Edward SonnenscheinLatham & Watkins LLP | May 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Patrick J. O MalleyDLA Piper | Aug 2020 | Text search only | 11 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 4.16 |