UTAC Holdings Ltd.
CIK 1637505Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jul 2015 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jan 2018 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Jones DayFirst linked Jul 2015 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Jul 2015 · Text search only · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Rajah & TannFirst linked Jul 2015 · Text search only · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- WongPartnership LLPFirst linked Jul 2015 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jul 2015 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jan 2018 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Jones Day | Jul 2015 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Jul 2015 | Text search only | 439 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.76 |
| Rajah & Tann | Jul 2015 | Text search only | 53 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| WongPartnership LLP | Jul 2015 | Text search only | 17 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 2.10 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael W. SturrockLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jul 2015 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.75×
- Sharon LauLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jul 2015 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- Robert E. GoedertKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jan 2018 · Text search only · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- John NelsonSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jul 2015 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael W. SturrockLatham & Watkins LLP | Jul 2015 | Named in a filing | 18 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 1.75 |
| Sharon LauLatham & Watkins LLP | Jul 2015 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
| Robert E. GoedertKirkland & Ellis | Jan 2018 | Text search only | 26 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| John NelsonSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jul 2015 | Text search only | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |