Wingstop Inc. WING (last ticker on record)
CIK 1636222Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked May 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,669 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Bingham McCutchenFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 291 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haynes and Boone | May 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.86 |
| King & Spalding | Mar 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.01 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,669 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Bingham McCutchen | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 291 | 0.94 | 0.38 | 1.04 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Greg R. SamuelHaynes and BooneFirst linked Dec 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Gregory R. SamuelHaynes and BooneFirst linked May 2019 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Carrie A. RatliffKing & SpaldingFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Ian D. SchumanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Keith M. TownsendKing & SpaldingFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.29×
- Marc D. JaffeLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 156 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greg R. SamuelHaynes and Boone | Dec 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.42 | 0.00 | 1.35 |
| Gregory R. SamuelHaynes and Boone | May 2019 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
| Carrie A. RatliffKing & Spalding | Feb 2016 | Named in a filing | 5 | 2.12 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Ian D. SchumanLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 91 | 1.06 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Keith M. TownsendKing & Spalding | Mar 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 58 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 0.29 |
| Marc D. JaffeLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 156 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 1.09 |