ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. ENR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1632790Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jan 2023 · Named in a filing · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Bryan CaveFirst linked Feb 2015 · Named in a filing · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Davis PolkFirst linked May 2015 · Text search only · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shearman & Sterling | Jan 2023 | Named in a filing | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Mar 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 889 | 1.29 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Bryan Cave | Feb 2015 | Named in a filing | 471 | 1.08 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| Davis Polk | May 2015 | Text search only | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gillian Emmett MoldowanShearman & SterlingFirst linked Jan 2023 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Bryan Cave Leighton PaisnerFirst linked Jan 2019 · Named in a filing · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.44×
- R. Randall WangBryan CaveFirst linked Jan 2019 · Named in a filing · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Steven A. CohenWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked May 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
- Michael KaplanDavis PolkFirst linked May 2015 · Text search only · 112 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gillian Emmett MoldowanShearman & Sterling | Jan 2023 | Named in a filing | 20 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 1.39 |
| Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner | Jan 2019 | Named in a filing | 44 | 2.17 | 0.00 | 0.44 |
| R. Randall WangBryan Cave | Jan 2019 | Named in a filing | 28 | 1.34 | 0.00 | 1.37 |
| Steven A. CohenWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | May 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 1.59 |
| Michael KaplanDavis Polk | May 2015 | Text search only | 112 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 0.86 |