KBS Growth & Income REIT, Inc.
CIK 1631256Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Duane MorrisFirst linked Oct 2015 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Oct 2015 · Text search only · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Oct 2015 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Sutherland Asbill & BrennanFirst linked Oct 2015 · Text search only · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Alston & BirdFirst linked Mar 2015 · Text search only · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Feb 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Duane Morris | Oct 2015 | Text search only | 413 | 0.76 | 1.28 | 1.06 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Oct 2015 | Text search only | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Oct 2015 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Sutherland Asbill & Brennan | Oct 2015 | Text search only | 130 | 0.94 | 0.16 | 0.77 |
| Alston & Bird | Mar 2015 | Text search only | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.79 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Carrie J. HartleyDLA PiperFirst linked Oct 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Laura K. SirianniDLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert H. BergdoltDLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carrie J. HartleyDLA Piper | Oct 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 1.15 | 0.00 | 1.34 |
| Laura K. SirianniDLA Piper | Feb 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert H. BergdoltDLA Piper | Feb 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 41 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.98 |