Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. CWK (last ticker on record)
CIK 1628369Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 15
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Apr 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Apr 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Carey OlsenFirst linked Mar 2019 · Text search only · 94 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Mar 2019 · Text search only · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Torys LLPFirst linked Mar 2019 · Text search only · 170 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Jul 2018 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jul 2018 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Fenwick & West LLPFirst linked Jul 2018 · Text search only · 443 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Allen & GledhillFirst linked May 2018 · Text search only · 64 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Allen & OveryFirst linked May 2018 · Text search only · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Armstrong TeasdaleFirst linked May 2018 · Text search only · 64 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked May 2018 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked May 2018 · Text search only · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- King & WoodFirst linked May 2018 · Text search only · 172 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | May 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Apr 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Ropes & Gray | Apr 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Carey Olsen | Mar 2019 | Text search only | 94 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Maples and Calder | Mar 2019 | Text search only | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Torys LLP | Mar 2019 | Text search only | 170 | 1.22 | 0.44 | 0.94 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Jul 2018 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Davis Polk | Jul 2018 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Fenwick & West LLP | Jul 2018 | Text search only | 443 | 0.95 | 0.21 | 1.23 |
| Allen & Gledhill | May 2018 | Text search only | 64 | 0.32 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Allen & Overy | May 2018 | Text search only | 244 | 1.00 | 0.36 | 0.66 |
| Armstrong Teasdale | May 2018 | Text search only | 64 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.51 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | May 2018 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Greenberg Traurig | May 2018 | Text search only | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| King & Wood | May 2018 | Text search only | 172 | 1.23 | 0.34 | 1.24 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kevin M. FrankKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Sarah Brooks GabrielKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert M. HaywardKirkland & EllisFirst linked Oct 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Ana SemperteguiKirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Arthur H. KohnCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Aug 2018 · Named in a filing · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Helena K. GrannisCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Apr 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.15× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Jeffrey D. KarpfCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Apr 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Patrick O BrienRopes & GrayFirst linked Apr 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Thomas FraserRopes & GrayFirst linked Apr 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kevin M. FrankKirkland & Ellis | Jan 2022 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.08 | 0.00 | 0.66 |
| Sarah Brooks GabrielKirkland & Ellis | Jan 2022 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert M. HaywardKirkland & Ellis | Oct 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 38 | 1.78 | 0.00 | 1.19 |
| Ana SemperteguiKirkland & Ellis | Mar 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 0.81 |
| Arthur H. KohnCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Aug 2018 | Named in a filing | 55 | 2.10 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
| Helena K. GrannisCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Apr 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 3.15 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Jeffrey D. KarpfCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Apr 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 2.58 | 0.00 | 1.42 |
| Patrick O BrienRopes & Gray | Apr 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 45 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Thomas FraserRopes & Gray | Apr 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |