Black Knight, Inc. BKI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1627014Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Aug 2022 · Named in a filing · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Dec 2014 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Dec 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked May 2015 · Text search only · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Cadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Apr 2015 · Text search only · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shearman & Sterling | Aug 2022 | Named in a filing | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Dec 2014 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Dec 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Cooley LLP | May 2015 | Text search only | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Apr 2015 | Text search only | 305 | 1.14 | 0.24 | 0.95 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Peter ByrneCooley LLPFirst linked May 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.54× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Alexander D. LynchWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Dec 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 115 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.45×
- C. Thomas HopkinsCooley LLPFirst linked May 2015 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Michael J. AielloWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked May 2015 · Text search only · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter ByrneCooley LLP | May 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 1.54 | 0.00 | 1.08 |
| Alexander D. LynchWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Dec 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 115 | 1.18 | 0.33 | 1.45 |
| C. Thomas HopkinsCooley LLP | May 2015 | Text search only | 17 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.04 |
| Michael J. AielloWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | May 2015 | Text search only | 107 | 1.23 | 0.00 | 0.75 |