STERIS Ltd STE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1624899Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2018
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Nov 2014 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jan 2015 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Nov 2014 · Text search only · 1,185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Jones DayFirst linked Nov 2014 · Text search only · 685 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Nov 2014 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.29 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Jan 2015 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
| DLA Piper | Nov 2014 | Text search only | 1,185 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.17 |
| Jones Day | Nov 2014 | Text search only | 685 | 1.25 | 0.55 | 1.11 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mark GordonWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Nov 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
- ANDREW R. BROWNSTEINWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jan 2015 · Text search only · 117 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.48×
- David A. KatzWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jan 2015 · Text search only · 108 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
- David K. LamWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jan 2015 · Text search only · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Edward D. HerlihyWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jan 2015 · Text search only · 148 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark GordonWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Nov 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
| ANDREW R. BROWNSTEINWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jan 2015 | Text search only | 117 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 0.48 |
| David A. KatzWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jan 2015 | Text search only | 108 | 1.44 | 0.00 | 0.68 |
| David K. LamWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jan 2015 | Text search only | 110 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 0.59 |
| Edward D. HerlihyWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jan 2015 | Text search only | 148 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 0.42 |