Imago BioSciences, Inc. IMGO (last ticker on record)
CIK 1623715Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Jan 2023 · Named in a filing · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Apr 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Jan 2023 | Named in a filing | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.95 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Apr 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.06 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ben PotterLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.45×
- R. Charles Cassidy IIILatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
- Julia A. ThompsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Benjamin A. PotterLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Richard A. KlineGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ben PotterLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.45 |
| R. Charles Cassidy IIILatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 1.70 |
| Julia A. ThompsonLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 1.07 |
| Benjamin A. PotterLatham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 1.07 |
| Richard A. KlineGoodwin Procter | Apr 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 56 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 1.17 |