Restaurant Brands International Inc. QSR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1618756Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stikeman ElliottFirst linked Aug 2018 · Named in a filing · 225 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Torys LLPFirst linked Dec 2015 · Named in a filing · 170 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Oct 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Davies Ward Phillips & VinebergFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in a filing · 94 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Oct 2014 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Lawson LundellFirst linked Oct 2014 · Text search only · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.84× · 95% wipeout 0.19×
- Fenwick & West LLPFirst linked Oct 2014 · Text search only · 443 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLPFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 155 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stikeman Elliott | Aug 2018 | Named in a filing | 225 | 1.08 | 0.11 | 1.06 |
| Torys LLP | Dec 2015 | Named in a filing | 170 | 1.22 | 0.44 | 0.94 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Oct 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg | Sep 2014 | Named in a filing | 94 | 0.35 | 0.21 | 1.11 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Sep 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Oct 2014 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Lawson Lundell | Oct 2014 | Text search only | 27 | 0.35 | 0.84 | 0.19 |
| Fenwick & West LLP | Oct 2014 | Text search only | 443 | 0.95 | 0.21 | 1.23 |
| Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 155 | 1.19 | 0.16 | 0.77 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kara L. MacCulloughGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Sep 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 2.41× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Joshua N. KorffKirkland & EllisFirst linked Dec 2014 · Named in a filing · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Michael KimKirkland & EllisFirst linked Oct 2014 · Named in a filing · 48 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.82×
- David B. FeirsteinKirkland & EllisFirst linked Oct 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Adam O. EmmerichWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- Stephen FraidinCadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- William B. SorabellaKirkland & EllisFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kara L. MacCulloughGreenberg Traurig | Sep 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 0.55 | 2.41 | 0.81 |
| Joshua N. KorffKirkland & Ellis | Dec 2014 | Named in a filing | 107 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.43 |
| Michael KimKirkland & Ellis | Oct 2014 | Named in a filing | 48 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 1.82 |
| David B. FeirsteinKirkland & Ellis | Oct 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Adam O. EmmerichWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 91 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| Stephen FraidinCadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 26 | 1.21 | 0.00 | 1.18 |
| William B. SorabellaKirkland & Ellis | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 14 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.00 |