Neff Corp NEFF (last ticker on record)
CIK 1617667Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Akerman LLPFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Oct 2014 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Oct 2014 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Stroock & Stroock & LavanFirst linked Oct 2014 · Text search only · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akerman LLP | Aug 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 211 | 1.09 | 0.67 | 1.36 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Sep 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Oct 2014 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Davis Polk | Oct 2014 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Stroock & Stroock & Lavan | Oct 2014 | Text search only | 178 | 0.98 | 0.78 | 0.96 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Esther L. MorenoAkerman LLPFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Arthur D. RobinsonSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Dennis D. LamontLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Kirk A. DavenportLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Lesley PengSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Esther L. MorenoAkerman LLP | Aug 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.28 |
| Arthur D. RobinsonSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Sep 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
| Dennis D. LamontLatham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.56 | 0.00 | 1.39 |
| Kirk A. DavenportLatham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 52 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Lesley PengSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Sep 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.52 | 0.00 | 1.55 |