Wayfair Inc. W (last ticker on record)
CIK 1616707Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jan 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Morgan LewisFirst linked May 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked May 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 1,185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Bingham McCutchenFirst linked May 2014 · Text search only · 291 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Goulston & StorrsFirst linked May 2014 · Text search only · 86 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morgan Lewis | May 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.01 |
| Goodwin Procter | Sep 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.16 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | May 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Ropes & Gray | May 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 914 | 0.97 | 0.14 | 0.91 |
| DLA Piper | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 1,185 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.17 |
| Bingham McCutchen | May 2014 | Text search only | 291 | 0.94 | 0.38 | 1.04 |
| Goulston & Storrs | May 2014 | Text search only | 86 | 0.90 | 0.34 | 1.30 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Celia A. SoehnerMorgan LewisFirst linked Sep 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Laurie A. CervenyMorgan LewisFirst linked Sep 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 1.30× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- Michael J. MinahanGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 0.91× · 95% wipeout 1.76×
- Emily E. TaylorLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.35×
- John H. ChoryLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
- Julie H. JonesRopes & GrayFirst linked May 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Susan L. MazurLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Thomas HoldenRopes & GrayFirst linked May 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- David J. WagnerDavid Wagner & Associates, P.C.First linked May 2014 · Text search only · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.31× · Went dark 1.93× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Celia A. SoehnerMorgan Lewis | Sep 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 0.45 | 0.00 | 1.33 |
| Laurie A. CervenyMorgan Lewis | Sep 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 1.32 | 1.30 | 0.51 |
| Michael J. MinahanGoodwin Procter | Sep 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 1.61 | 0.91 | 1.76 |
| Emily E. TaylorLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.35 |
| John H. ChoryLatham & Watkins LLP | May 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 1.50 |
| Julie H. JonesRopes & Gray | May 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 0.41 | 0.00 | 1.26 |
| Susan L. MazurLatham & Watkins LLP | May 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.30 |
| Thomas HoldenRopes & Gray | May 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| David J. WagnerDavid Wagner & Associates, P.C. | May 2014 | Text search only | 45 | 2.31 | 1.93 | 1.28 |