IsoPlexis Corp ISO (last ticker on record)
CIK 1615055Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- 95%
- Nov 2021 to Dec 2022
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLPFirst linked Feb 2023 · Named in a filing · 127 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked May 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Aug 2021 · Text search only · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Golenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLPFirst linked Aug 2021 · Text search only · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 1.50× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Aug 2021 · Text search only · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Chapman and CutlerFirst linked Jul 2021 · Text search only · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.32× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP | Feb 2023 | Named in a filing | 127 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 0.91 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | May 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Cooley LLP | Aug 2021 | Text search only | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Golenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLP | Aug 2021 | Text search only | 55 | 0.59 | 1.50 | 1.41 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Aug 2021 | Text search only | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Chapman and Cutler | Jul 2021 | Text search only | 95 | 1.17 | 0.32 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Matthew G. JonesCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked May 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- William V. FoggCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked May 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Ryan SansomCooley LLPFirst linked Aug 2021 · Text search only · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Brian D. MillerLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jul 2021 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.06×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew G. JonesCravath Swaine & Moore | May 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| William V. FoggCravath Swaine & Moore | May 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 38 | 1.64 | 0.00 | 1.21 |
| Ryan SansomCooley LLP | Aug 2021 | Text search only | 40 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.93 |
| Brian D. MillerLatham & Watkins LLP | Jul 2021 | Text search only | 7 | 1.30 | 0.00 | 2.06 |