Cadence Bancorporation CADE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1614184Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Waller Lansden Dortch & DavisFirst linked May 2021 · Named in a filing · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.65× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Nelson MullinsFirst linked Jun 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 301 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Kilpatrick TownsendFirst linked Jun 2018 · Text search only · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- Jones WalkerFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.23× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis | May 2021 | Named in a filing | 76 | 1.06 | 0.65 | 1.20 |
| Nelson Mullins | Jun 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 301 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.88 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Sep 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Kilpatrick Townsend | Jun 2018 | Text search only | 154 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
| Jones Walker | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 161 | 1.34 | 0.23 | 0.94 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Edward D. HerlihyWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jun 2018 · Named in a filing · 148 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.43×
- Mark F. VeblenWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jan 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- David E. ShapiroWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- John M. WillisNelson MullinsFirst linked Jun 2018 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Erich BluhmSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Feb 2018 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.64×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edward D. HerlihyWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jun 2018 | Named in a filing | 148 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 0.43 |
| Mark F. VeblenWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jan 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.98 |
| David E. ShapiroWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Sep 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 56 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 0.54 |
| John M. WillisNelson Mullins | Jun 2018 | Text search only | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Erich BluhmSullivan & Cromwell | Feb 2018 | Text search only | 15 | 3.77 | 0.00 | 1.64 |