Great Western Bancorp, Inc. GWB (last ticker on record)
CIK 1613665Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in a filing · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Nyemaster Goode, P.C.First linked Mar 2016 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 1.20× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jul 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Briggs and Morgan, P.A.First linked Mar 2016 · Text search only · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 1.76× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Dec 2021 | Named in a filing | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Nyemaster Goode, P.C. | Mar 2016 | Named in a filing | 20 | 0.67 | 1.20 | 0.88 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Jul 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Briggs and Morgan, P.A. | Mar 2016 | Text search only | 39 | 0.47 | 1.76 | 1.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mark C. DickinsonNyemaster Goode, P.C.First linked Mar 2016 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Zachary L. CochranKing & SpaldingFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Catherine M. ClarkinSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jul 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Mark J. MentingSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jul 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark C. DickinsonNyemaster Goode, P.C. | Mar 2016 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Zachary L. CochranKing & Spalding | Aug 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| Catherine M. ClarkinSullivan & Cromwell | Jul 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 52 | 1.52 | 0.00 | 0.77 |
| Mark J. MentingSullivan & Cromwell | Jul 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 1.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 |