CDK Global, Inc. CDK (last ticker on record)
CIK 1609702Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jun 2019
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jul 2022 · Named in a filing · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Jun 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2015 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Jul 2022 | Named in a filing | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Jun 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.81 |
| Shearman & Sterling | May 2015 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cheryl ChanDavis PolkFirst linked Jul 2022 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Leonard KreyninDavis PolkFirst linked Jul 2022 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- David S. HuntingtonPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Jun 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Monica K. ThurmondPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cheryl ChanDavis Polk | Jul 2022 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Leonard KreyninDavis Polk | Jul 2022 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.10 |
| David S. HuntingtonPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Jun 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 51 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.78 |
| Monica K. ThurmondPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 32 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 1.01 |