Affimed N.V. AFMD (last ticker on record)
CIK 1608390Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jul 2015 to May 2025
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Dec 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Davis PolkFirst linked May 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Aug 2014 · Text search only · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked May 2014 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLPFirst linked May 2014 · Text search only · 258 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked May 2014 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Dec 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| Davis Polk | May 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Aug 2014 | Text search only | 826 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.14 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | May 2014 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.75 |
| Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP | May 2014 | Text search only | 258 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | May 2014 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.41 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Derek J. DostalDavis PolkFirst linked Oct 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 114 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Sophia HudsonDavis PolkFirst linked Jun 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Richard D. Truesdell Jr.Davis PolkFirst linked May 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Geoffrey E. LiebmannCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked May 2014 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Derek J. DostalDavis Polk | Oct 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 114 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 1.21 |
| Sophia HudsonDavis Polk | Jun 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
| Richard D. Truesdell Jr.Davis Polk | May 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 149 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Geoffrey E. LiebmannCahill Gordon & Reindel | May 2014 | Text search only | 10 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 1.43 |