Lifeward Ltd. LFWD (last ticker on record)
CIK 1607962Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jul 2018
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Dec 2015 to Apr 2020
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLPFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Oct 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- White & CaseFirst linked May 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Pepper HamiltonFirst linked Mar 2022 · Text search only · 340 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Oct 2017 · Text search only · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Pearl CohenFirst linked Aug 2014 · Text search only · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP | Mar 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 154 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| Goodwin Procter | Oct 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| White & Case | May 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Pepper Hamilton | Mar 2022 | Text search only | 340 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 1.13 |
| Cooley LLP | Oct 2017 | Text search only | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Pearl Cohen | Aug 2014 | Text search only | 44 | 1.15 | 0.68 | 1.35 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Rick A. WernerHaynes and BooneFirst linked Jun 2025 · Named in a filing · 64 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Jennifer L. PorterGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Rachael M. BusheyGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Laura Katherine MannWhite & CaseFirst linked Oct 2021 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- Scott LeviWhite & CaseFirst linked Oct 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.44×
- Colin J. DiamondWhite & CaseFirst linked May 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 83 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Gary KasharWhite & CaseFirst linked May 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
- Alla DigilovaHaynes and BooneFirst linked Jun 2025 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.41×
- Aaron M. LampertNorton RoseFirst linked May 2014 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rick A. WernerHaynes and Boone | Jun 2025 | Named in a filing | 64 | 0.44 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| Jennifer L. PorterGoodwin Procter | Mar 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Rachael M. BusheyGoodwin Procter | Mar 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.97 |
| Laura Katherine MannWhite & Case | Oct 2021 | Named in a filing | 17 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 1.40 |
| Scott LeviWhite & Case | Oct 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 1.52 | 0.00 | 2.44 |
| Colin J. DiamondWhite & Case | May 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 83 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| Gary KasharWhite & Case | May 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 0.68 |
| Alla DigilovaHaynes and Boone | Jun 2025 | Text search only | 36 | 1.06 | 0.00 | 0.41 |
| Aaron M. LampertNorton Rose | May 2014 | Text search only | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.69 |