PointClickCare Corp.
CIK 1606766Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Wildeboer DellelceFirst linked Jun 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Sills Cummis & GrossFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Stikeman ElliottFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 225 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | Jun 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Wildeboer Dellelce | Jun 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.20 |
| Sills Cummis & Gross | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 44 | 1.02 | 0.82 | 0.93 |
| Stikeman Elliott | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 225 | 1.08 | 0.11 | 1.06 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joseph C. Theis Jr.Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Kenneth J. GordonGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 1.09× · 95% wipeout 0.41×
- Christopher J. AustinOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Jun 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.54×
- Mark H. BurnettTesta, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLPFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joseph C. Theis Jr.Goodwin Procter | Jun 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Kenneth J. GordonGoodwin Procter | Jun 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 1.18 | 1.09 | 0.41 |
| Christopher J. AustinOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Jun 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 2.54 |
| Mark H. BurnettTesta, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLP | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 11 | 1.60 | 0.00 | 0.00 |