Atento S.A.
CIK 1606457Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Dec 2022 · Named in a filing · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Arendt & MedernachFirst linked May 2014 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Jul 2014 · Text search only · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sidley Austin | Dec 2022 | Named in a filing | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Arendt & Medernach | May 2014 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | May 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Jul 2014 | Text search only | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John H. ButlerSidley AustinFirst linked Dec 2022 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Peter S. SeligsonKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jul 2021 · Named in a filing · 73 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Brian HechtKirkland & EllisFirst linked Sep 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Christopher A. KitchenKirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2014 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Joshua N. KorffKirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John H. ButlerSidley Austin | Dec 2022 | Named in a filing | 20 | 0.39 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Peter S. SeligsonKirkland & Ellis | Jul 2021 | Named in a filing | 73 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Brian HechtKirkland & Ellis | Sep 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| Christopher A. KitchenKirkland & Ellis | May 2014 | Named in a filing | 25 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.81 |
| Joshua N. KorffKirkland & Ellis | May 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 107 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.43 |