MOL Global, Inc. MOLGY (last ticker on record)
CIK 1604929Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Apr 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Nov 2014 to Apr 2017
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in a filing · 1,145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Emmet Marvin & MartinFirst linked Oct 2014 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Jun 2014 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Apr 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
| Maples and Calder | Apr 2014 | Named in a filing | 1,145 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Apr 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.82 |
| Emmet Marvin & Martin | Oct 2014 | Text search only | 199 | 0.80 | 0.16 | 0.84 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Jun 2014 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 0.96 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- James C. LinDavis PolkFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Jonathan B. StoneSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.51× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Rajeev P. DuggalSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James C. LinDavis Polk | Apr 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 76 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| Jonathan B. StoneSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Apr 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 60 | 0.51 | 0.00 | 1.19 |
| Rajeev P. DuggalSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Apr 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.82 |