CABOT CORP CBT (last ticker on record)
CIK 16040Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jan 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ropes & Gray | Sep 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 914 | 0.97 | 0.14 | 0.91 |
| Goodwin Procter | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.16 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- William J. MichenerRopes & GrayFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Paul KinsellaRopes & GrayFirst linked Feb 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Zachary BlumeRopes & GrayFirst linked Feb 2020 · Named in a filing · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 1.69× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- David A. FineRopes & GrayFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.95× · Went dark 1.71× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Keith F. HigginsRopes & GrayFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.53×
- JOHN O. NEWELLGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William J. MichenerRopes & Gray | Mar 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.26 |
| Paul KinsellaRopes & Gray | Feb 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 54 | 1.70 | 0.39 | 0.63 |
| Zachary BlumeRopes & Gray | Feb 2020 | Named in a filing | 31 | 1.30 | 1.69 | 0.51 |
| David A. FineRopes & Gray | Aug 2016 | Named in a filing | 17 | 2.95 | 1.71 | 0.00 |
| Keith F. HigginsRopes & Gray | Sep 2009 | Named in a filing | 35 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 0.53 |
| JOHN O. NEWELLGoodwin Procter | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |