Gamida Cell Ltd. GMDA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1600847Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Apr 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Mar 2022 to Apr 2024
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Meitar Law OfficesFirst linked May 2020 · Named in a filing · 61 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Jun 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jun 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2021 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Duane MorrisFirst linked Nov 2019 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Meitar Liquornik Geva Leshem Tal, Law OfficesFirst linked Aug 2018 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meitar Law Offices | May 2020 | Named in a filing | 61 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.69 |
| Cooley LLP | Jun 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Davis Polk | Jun 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Mar 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2021 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Duane Morris | Nov 2019 | Text search only | 413 | 0.76 | 1.28 | 1.06 |
| Meitar Liquornik Geva Leshem Tal, Law Offices | Aug 2018 | Text search only | 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.23 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLPFirst linked Jun 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Derek J. DostalDavis PolkFirst linked Jun 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 114 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Joshua A. KaufmanCooley LLPFirst linked Jun 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Michael KaplanDavis PolkFirst linked Jun 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 112 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Joel L. RubinsteinWhite & CaseFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 195 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Mark SelingerMcDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Michael E. SullivanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2021 · Text search only · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- James T. SeeryDuane MorrisFirst linked Nov 2019 · Text search only · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.87× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLP | Jun 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 184 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Derek J. DostalDavis Polk | Jun 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 114 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 1.22 |
| Joshua A. KaufmanCooley LLP | Jun 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 0.97 |
| Michael KaplanDavis Polk | Jun 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 112 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 0.89 |
| Joel L. RubinsteinWhite & Case | Mar 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 195 | 0.74 | 0.55 | 1.03 |
| Mark SelingerMcDermott Will & Emery | Mar 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 0.42 | 0.00 | 0.98 |
| Michael E. SullivanLatham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2021 | Text search only | 43 | 0.56 | 0.00 | 0.79 |
| James T. SeeryDuane Morris | Nov 2019 | Text search only | 76 | 0.87 | 0.00 | 1.14 |