1stdibs.com, Inc. DIBS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1600641Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Feb 2021 · Text search only · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Feb 2021 · Text search only · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Feb 2021 | Text search only | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| Willkie Farr | Feb 2021 | Text search only | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Christopher WingPillsbury WinthropFirst linked Jun 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Edwin M. O ConnorGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.37× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Erica D. KassmanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.41×
- Ronald A. Fleming Jr.Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.82× · Went dark 1.42× · 95% wipeout 2.04×
- Stephen M. DavisGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Craig M. SchmitzGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2021 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 3.35× · 95% wipeout 2.18×
- Gordon R. CaplanWillkie FarrFirst linked Feb 2021 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Sean M. EwenWillkie FarrFirst linked Feb 2021 · Text search only · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christopher WingPillsbury Winthrop | Jun 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Edwin M. O ConnorGoodwin Procter | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 0.37 | 0.00 | 1.18 |
| Erica D. KassmanLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 3.16 | 0.00 | 2.41 |
| Ronald A. Fleming Jr.Pillsbury Winthrop | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 1.82 | 1.42 | 2.04 |
| Stephen M. DavisGoodwin Procter | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 1.61 | 1.35 | 1.39 |
| Craig M. SchmitzGoodwin Procter | Feb 2021 | Text search only | 13 | 1.41 | 3.35 | 2.18 |
| Gordon R. CaplanWillkie Farr | Feb 2021 | Text search only | 14 | 1.44 | 0.00 | 1.38 |
| Sean M. EwenWillkie Farr | Feb 2021 | Text search only | 31 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 1.01 |