TerraForm Power NY Holdings, Inc. TERP (last ticker on record)
CIK 1599947Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 14
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- McMillan LLPFirst linked Jun 2020 · Named in a filing · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.73× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Torys LLPFirst linked Jun 2020 · Named in a filing · 170 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Aug 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jul 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Chadbourne & ParkeFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jan 2015 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Jan 2015 · Text search only · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jul 2014 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Jul 2014 · Text search only · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Feb 2014 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Feb 2014 · Text search only · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Feb 2014 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McMillan LLP | Jun 2020 | Named in a filing | 95 | 1.06 | 1.73 | 0.92 |
| Torys LLP | Jun 2020 | Named in a filing | 170 | 1.22 | 0.44 | 0.94 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Aug 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jul 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Feb 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Chadbourne & Parke | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 110 | 1.64 | 0.62 | 0.87 |
| Morgan Lewis | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Davis Polk | Jan 2015 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Jan 2015 | Text search only | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 1.04 |
| Goodwin Procter | Jul 2014 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Jul 2014 | Text search only | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| HALE AND DORR | Feb 2014 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Feb 2014 | Text search only | 500 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.08 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Feb 2014 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Robert S. RisoleoSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Nov 2017 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 2.55× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Andrea L. NicolasSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Dec 2014 · Named in a filing · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Dennis M. MyersKirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Victoria HaleSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.06×
- Raphael M. RussoPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Jul 2014 · Text search only · 72 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Steven J. WilliamsPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Jul 2014 · Text search only · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Yoel KranzGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jul 2014 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert S. RisoleoSullivan & Cromwell | Nov 2017 | Named in a filing | 15 | 0.64 | 2.55 | 1.44 |
| Andrea L. NicolasSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Dec 2014 | Named in a filing | 33 | 1.41 | 0.00 | 1.43 |
| Dennis M. MyersKirkland & Ellis | Feb 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 69 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
| Victoria HaleSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 52 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 2.06 |
| Raphael M. RussoPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Jul 2014 | Text search only | 72 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Steven J. WilliamsPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Jul 2014 | Text search only | 35 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 1.46 |
| Yoel KranzGoodwin Procter | Jul 2014 | Text search only | 10 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 0.80 |