IHS Markit Ltd. INFO (last ticker on record)
CIK 1598014Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Jun 2014 · Text search only · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Apr 2014 · Text search only · 398 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Ashurst LLPFirst linked Apr 2014 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Clifford Chance US LLPFirst linked Apr 2014 · Text search only · 260 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Fasken MartineauFirst linked Apr 2014 · Text search only · 126 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Patterson Belknap Webb & TylerFirst linked Apr 2014 · Text search only · 185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.51× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Apr 2014 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Feb 2022 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Davis Polk | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Jun 2014 | Text search only | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Andrews Kurth LLP | Apr 2014 | Text search only | 398 | 1.27 | 0.35 | 1.30 |
| Ashurst LLP | Apr 2014 | Text search only | 22 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Clifford Chance US LLP | Apr 2014 | Text search only | 260 | 0.92 | 0.41 | 0.85 |
| Fasken Martineau | Apr 2014 | Text search only | 126 | 1.03 | 0.37 | 0.87 |
| Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler | Apr 2014 | Text search only | 185 | 0.89 | 0.51 | 1.17 |
| Proskauer Rose | Apr 2014 | Text search only | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
| Reed Smith | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Trevor S. NorwitzWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Victor GoldfeldWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.44×
- Derek J. DostalDavis PolkFirst linked Apr 2018 · Named in a filing · 114 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- H. Oliver SmithDavis PolkFirst linked May 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Louis L. GoldbergDavis PolkFirst linked May 2016 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Richard D. Truesdell Jr.Davis PolkFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Victoria HaleSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jun 2014 · Text search only · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.06×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trevor S. NorwitzWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Feb 2022 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.85 | 0.00 | 1.44 |
| Victor GoldfeldWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Feb 2022 | Named in a filing | 29 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 0.44 |
| Derek J. DostalDavis Polk | Apr 2018 | Named in a filing | 114 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 1.22 |
| H. Oliver SmithDavis Polk | May 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 1.49 | 0.00 | 1.19 |
| Louis L. GoldbergDavis Polk | May 2016 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.33 | 0.00 | 0.77 |
| Richard D. Truesdell Jr.Davis Polk | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 149 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 1.06 |
| Victoria HaleSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jun 2014 | Text search only | 52 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 2.06 |